StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Anti-Death Penalty - Research Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper tells that ever since the beginning of humankind, the death penalty has been used as a manner by which wrongdoers are punished for their crimes against society. The oft-quoted Biblical saying, “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth” captures succinctly this notion of retributive justice…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.3% of users find it useful
Anti-Death Penalty
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Anti-Death Penalty"

Anti-Death Penalty Essay Ever since the beginning of humankind, the death penalty has been used as a manner by which wrongdoers are punished for their crimes against society. The oft-quoted Biblical saying, “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth” captures succinctly this notion of retributive justice. A man, for instance, who has been adjudged guilty of murdering another man, will be sentenced to death. The manner of death is another issue altogether. Many imaginative and cruel ways of implementing the death penalty have been witnessed through time – from the guillotine to the garrote to firing squads to gas chambers to electric chairs -- before the more “humane” lethal injection has been made the manner of choice in countries that consider themselves civilized. However, there still are some countries in the world that use cruel ways of implementing capital punishment. Worse, these are for crimes that in many jurisdictions would not warrant the death penalty, or in some cases, any punishment at all. In Sudan, for example, a married person found guilty of adultery is executed by stoning; an unmarried person receives 100 lashes. In Afghanistan during the Taliban regime, a woman and a man were stoned to death in public using palm-sized stones for non-marital sex. The man died within minutes but the woman had to be finished off by dropping a large chunk of stone over her head. This paper will argue that the death penalty should no longer be used as a form of punishment. Four main arguments will be forwarded. First, the irrevocability of the death penalty means that there is no hope of correcting an injustice committed against a convict later found to be innocent. Second, it violates the principle of restorative justice, which should replace the principle of retributive justice. Third, it has been proven by empirical evidence that it in no way deters crime or helps in crime prevention. Fourth, racial biases affect any objective application of the death penalty law. I. The Irrevocability of the death penalty Human errors and frailty, as well as the lack of adequate forensic facilities in some countries, have led to many convictions that later turn out to be wrong. In a situation where the maximum penalty that may be meted out is life imprisonment, the State may still be able to provide reparation for an innocent man wrongly convicted. He will be allowed to go free and will even be given damages. In a country where the death penalty is legal, the finality of the sentence of death renders any mistake in convictions irreversible. The problem is serious considering that, according to a death penalty information website, “since 1973, at least 121 people have been released from death row after evidence of their innocence emerged. During the same period of time, over 982 people have been executed. Thus, for every eight people executed, we have found one person on death row who never should have been convicted.” This issue has generated widespread public outrage and is perhaps one of the more compelling reasons as to why the anti-death penalty advocates are gaining ground. Says Haines (125): An analysis of newspaper coverage suggests that flawed convictions, in which possibly innocent persons either suffer or narrowly escape execution, are especially potent threats to public support for capital punishment. The injustice brought about by sending an innocent man to prison is magnified a thousandfold by the horrific idea that such an innocent man might be wrongly executed. There can be no recompense that may be provided to the dead. II. Restorative, not Retributive Justice In recent times, we have seen a paradigm shift from retributive justice, where a convict is made to pay for grievances to the community he belongs to, to restorative justice, wherein a recognition is made that a crime has been committed and a wrong has been done, but the convict is still a member of the community and is perceived as a human being with the capacity for reform. According to Braithwaite (563): Three types of restorative justice standards are articulated: limiting, maximizing, and enabling standards. They are developed as multidimensional criteria for evaluating restorative justice programmes. A way of summarizing the long list of standards is that they define ways of securing the republican freedom (dominion) of citizens through repair, transformation, empowerment with others and limiting the exercise of power over others. A defence of the list is also articulated in terms of values that can be found in consensus UN Human Rights agreements and from what we know empirically about what citizens seek from restorative justice. We must recognize that every person still has the capacity to reform, and having that capacity, must be given the chance to rebuild his life and work his way towards becoming an upright member of society once more. Death penalty denies him that opportunity. It is condemnatory and final and based on a simplistic formulation of “an eye for an eye” that should have no place and should not be endorsed in civilized society. III. Death Penalty is not a Deterrence Many have argued that the death penalty should be used to deter crimes. As stated by Passell (61), “Execution may be commonly viewed as a distasteful alternative to other forms of punishment, but an alternative that could be defended on pragmatic grounds, if the gains in crime prevention are sufficiently great.” The empirical evidence, however, militates to the contrary. For example, it has been established that states in the United States that do not have the death penalty in their record books generally have fewer murders than states that employ this particular type of punishment. Moreover, the U.S., with the death penalty, has more murders and more capital crimes committed yearly than the countries of the European Union, which have collectively decided to renounce abolish the death penalty as a demonstration of its commitment to human rights. Given that a great number of crimes committed are not premeditated, it is not difficult to see how the death penalty would not work as a deterrent. In fact, the former Texas attorney general himself, a state known for its great number of executions, Jim Mattox, was quoted as saying, “It is my own experience that those executed in Texas were not deterred by the existence of the death penalty law. I think in most cases you'll find that the murder was committed under severe drug and alcohol abuse." Indeed, certainty of capture, better law enforcement and a judicial process that is truly fair and impartial are more effective deterrents to crime. It is not the death penalty, for there is no evidence whatsoever to support the conclusion that capital punishment is an effective deterrent to crime. IV. Racial Issues The death penalty debate is in itself a very complicated and very emotional issue. It is made even more protracted when the racial dimension or angle is added into the picture. And yet, it cannot be denied that race is an important factor to be considered when discussing or mulling over the issue. While it may seem that it is only a matter of ascertaining a person’s guilt and imposing the appropriate penalties, there are invisible biases and historical prejudices at play and the statistics to corroborate this assertion are staggering. Says Wolfgang and Riedel (119), The record of executions in the United States has long shown that black defendants are disproportionately subjected to this sanction… Strong statistically significant differences in the proportions of blacks sentenced to death, compared to whites, when a variety of nonracial aggravating circumstances are considered, permit the conclusion that the sentencing differentials are the product of racial discrimination.” Conclusion While certainly we must always strive for justice and recognize the right of the victim to seek it from the person who has committed wrong and from society at large, there are more reasons to abolish the death penalty than to retain it. We must heed the call to balance justice with human rights, retribution with redemption. Works Cited Braithwaite, John. “Setting Standards for Restorative Justice.” The British Journal of Criminology Vol. 42. (2002) pp. 563-577. Haines, Herb. “Flawed Executions, the Anti-Death Penalty Movement, and the Politics of Capital Punishment.” Social Problems, Vol. 39, No. 2 (May, 1992), pp. 125-138. Passell, Peter. “The Deterrent Effect of the Death Penalty: A Statistical Test” Stanford Law Review, Vol. 28, No. 1 (Nov., 1975), pp. 61-80. Riedel, M. & Wolfgang, M. “Race, Judicial Discretion, and the Death Penalty.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 407, Blacks and the Law (May, 1973), pp. 119-133 Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Anti-Death Penalty Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
Anti-Death Penalty Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/social-science/1526938-anti-death-penalty-essay
(Anti-Death Penalty Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
Anti-Death Penalty Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words. https://studentshare.org/social-science/1526938-anti-death-penalty-essay.
“Anti-Death Penalty Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/social-science/1526938-anti-death-penalty-essay.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Anti-Death Penalty

Is Death Penalty Justifiable

In a more practical note, Anti-Death Penalty groups say that a session of capital execution or death penalty is expensive and costs more than to imprison the convicted criminals for as long as they live.... In the essay “Is Death penalty Justifiable?... Nowadays, countries and government systems that still use the death penalty as capital punishment are abundant while some countries have abolished this in their systems through time.... The death penalty advocates stress mainly that this system will deter crime and moreover give justice or retribution to the crime victims and their families....
3 Pages (750 words) Assignment

Death Penalty in the United States

Those who violate the laws have broken a trust with the citizenry, which, by exacting a penalty, seeks compensation for an act considered an affront to the purpose for which submission to civil authority was commenced (Bigel 46).... More than seven out of ten respondents regard the removal of the threat that "the killer might kill again" as an important benefit of the death penalty, but 68 percent regret that the current system results in "mistaken executions....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Facts about the Death Penalty

This review discusses the justice system of the Death penalty.... The review discusses the effects of the death penalty.... In 2000, Governor George Ryan of Illinois suspended executions in that state and “commuted the death sentences of all Illinois death row inmates in 2003”   There are those who believe that the process is biased and must be curtailed until these issues can be examined, however, I would argue that despite any bias in the application of the death penalty, most of the criminals currently sitting on death row are guilty of the crimes they committed and should see their sentence through to its fruition....
5 Pages (1250 words) Literature review

Playing to the Gallery: Public Opinion as a Factor in Death Penalty Court Decisions, particularly Furman v. Georgia

Of particular import to this paper is the concurring opinion of Justice Brennan wherein he opined that the death penalty law runs contrary to a growing public consciousness in contemporary society that has become unwilling to support state-sponsored executions of convicted criminals.... As the Supreme Court did not say that the death penalty law was unconstitutional, only that it was random in its application – and in the Furman case, would result in the killing of a mentally-challenged man – states interpreted this to mean that they could rewrite their death penalty statute so as to incorporate a set of definite and reasonable standards for courts to follow....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Death Penalty Cases

Pro death penalty advocates generally state crime statistics, while anti death penalty advocates cite the cost and immorality of state… Many factors can be revealed from the statistics.... This does not include just the death penalty cases, but all homicides.... The death penalty varies from state to state, but death penalty cases have certain criteria.... The pro death penalty advocates always give the statistics portraying the victims in the most sympathetic light, with the murderer in the worst light....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Kants Position Concerning the Death Penalty

Since 1976 Texas has put a number of individuals to death for committing specific crimes that were of such a nature to warrant such a punishment, since the United States Supreme Court reinstated the death penalty that same year.... 44) such that the death penalty might well be appropriate....
2 Pages (500 words) Research Paper

Death Penalty as the Harshest form of Punishment Enforced in the US

The "Death Penalty as the Harshest form of Punishment Enforced in the US" paper trace the history of the death penalty and presents the views of both pro-death penalty and Anti-Death Penalty advocates.... Today lethal injections are the most common form of execution… The debate in the United States continues while individual states have their own guidelines for imposing the death penalty.... Despite this, generally, all states the criminals convicted of first-degree murder face the death penalty....
12 Pages (3000 words) Article

The Death Penalty in the United States

The author of the article wrote a paper in order to show people how the Anti-Death Penalty movement is full of lies and misinformation.... In the paper “The Death penalty in the United States” the author discusses the article titled “Death penalty” written by Almanac of Policy Issues Organization.... The piece of literature describes different aspects of the controversial penalty topic.... hellip; The paper provides a historical background on when the death penalty in the United States was banned which was in the year 1974 and the latter restitution of the death penalty policy in 1977....
5 Pages (1250 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us