StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...

Impeaching a Witness during Trial - Assignment Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper “Impeaching a Witness during Trial” discusses the purpose of impeaching a witness during the trial, which is to discredit him, and annihilate with as much force as possible, if possible, the effect of his testimony. The rules relating to the impeachment of a witness apply to the defendant…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92% of users find it useful
Impeaching a Witness during Trial
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Impeaching a Witness during Trial"

Download file to see previous pages

This type of evidence is only admissible after the character of the witness is attacked by evidence of any form. Here for example, since Ralph noted on his application that he never had an accident, his driving record could be introduced as evidence to impeach his testimony, the testimony being Ralph's application (which is considered to be a federal document because it is submitted to the port authority which is a government entity) and demonstrate that it was false, thus proving that Ralph has a propensity to lie.

Furthermore, any witnesses on Ralph's behalf would be properly questioned in order to impeach Ralph's character for truthfulness as well. (Fed. Ru. Evid. 608). It is true that Ed Norton would testify that Ralph is a great guy and a terrific friend, but he has no business or employment relationship with Ralph. It should be noted that Ed as a character witness will be questioned about specific instances of conduct on part of the Ralph as the principal witness to test his knowledge on Ralph's character.

Thus Ed may be questioned on whether Ralph ever told him about his high school suspension. It must be noted that any defense attorney worth their salt would immediately object to the question if, at the time of Ralph's arrest, the high school suspension was over ten years old. This rule applies if more than ten years has elapsed since the later date between the following: (1) the date of the conviction and (2) release of the witness from the confinement imposed for that conviction. Here, it is true that Ralph was not convicted at the time his suspension for a crime related to it.

One might first think that the suspension would not find its' way into trial however there are exceptions to this rule of evidence. Specific instances of misconduct that did not result in a conviction can be admitted for impeachment purposes if the scope of its admission is to demonstrate the witnesses character for truthfulness, in the discretion of the court the probative value of the question outweighs any prejudice to the defendant; the evidence is offered in good faith; the act has a direct bearing on the veracity of the witness with regards to the issues being litigated.

It cannot be understated that extrinsic evidence of specific instances of prior bad acts is not permitted when their only relevance is to impeach the witnesses' credibility. Thus, it appears that Ralph's high school suspension would be admitted at trial. It should be noted again that the trial court enjoys immense discretion so the ten-year limitation may be construed by the court to apply to non-convicted prior bad acts. For example, if Ralph is 25 at the time of trial, the suspension may be admitted, but if he is 35 at the time of trial, it most likely will not.

Finally, we do not usually see this type of evidence offered unless the parties know each other.

...Download file to see next pages Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Impeaching a Witness during Trial Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words, n.d.)
Impeaching a Witness during Trial Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1514037-homework-2
(Impeaching a Witness During Trial Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
Impeaching a Witness During Trial Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/1514037-homework-2.
“Impeaching a Witness During Trial Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”. https://studentshare.org/law/1514037-homework-2.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Impeaching a Witness during Trial

MSC Public Health and Health Promotion

Obesity among children is an unfortunate situation because it opens them to multiple risk factors, including type 2 diabetes, heart diseases, and a variety of other co-morbidities before or during early adulthood (Lobstein et al.... MSC Public Health and Health Promotion Health Promotion Practice SHGM 54 Jane Thomas Description of the placement Student No: 628587 Word Count: 4409 Submission Date: 21-4-2011 Introduction I decided to do my placement within an organisation called MEND –Mind, Exercise, Nutrition and Do it....
13 Pages (3250 words) Essay

The Impeachment Process

This precedent could be used by future House members to analyze critically the consequences of impeaching a President with substantial public support.... Formally, impeachment can be defined as the “Constitutional process whereby the House of Representatives may accuse of misconduct high officers of the Federal Government for trial in the Senate” (Lectic Law Library).... As conviction became inevitable for his high crime charges, to avoid the dishonor of trial, Nixon resigned from his post in August 1974....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Analysis of problems and solutions occurs during this stage in the agenda setting process (Mark, 2012).... Patient Protection and Affordable care act in 2010 Name Institution The healthcare system has seen a considerable number of successful and failed policies in their quest to reform the entire system....
6 Pages (1500 words) Term Paper

Admissible Evidence and Exclusionary Rule

At the trial, the prosecution did not produce a search warrant as evidence (Mapp v.... These exceptions include non-trial criminal proceedings for example, bail proceedings, and a proceeding in revoking parole as an exception.... It holds that constitutionally, there may be admission of evidence obtained illegally in such non-trial criminal proceedings.... Abstract The Exclusionary Rule is a remedy available to a defendant in a criminal case to protect them against the police officers violating his constitutional rights during their searches....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Change Management in Business

The writer of this paper states that change management refers to the process of directing business operations to the desired future in line with the organizational goals.... In the recent past, change management is a topic that has gained a lot of interest from many scholars.... hellip; Aiken and Keller (2003) present the irrational side of change management pinpointing the challenges that leaders face in implementing change within their organizations....
1 Pages (250 words) Article

Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333 (1966) & Williams v. Florida 399 U.S. 78

He claimed to be innocent and alleged that the trial was unfair, as the trial judge had not safeguarded him from the enormous, extensive, and damaging… Certiorari was granted by the US Supreme Court (U.... 333 (1966) , 1966). The US Supreme Court made the strongest statement supporting the right of the defendant to a jury that was not biased by Case Summary of the of the Case Summary Sheppard v Maxwell Facts of the Case In Sheppard v Maxwell, Sheppard was convicted of second degree murder by the trial court, for murdering his pregnant wife....
2 Pages (500 words) Assignment

Construction and Maintenance of the Building

hellip; A trial pit is an excavation in the ground which helps and allows us to investigate or sample the structure and composition of the subsurface, this is usually dug during a site investigation, analysis, or a soil survey.... Usually, the trial pits are burrowed before the construction so as to ascertain the water table and geology of that site....
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study

The History of the Human Rights Law in Great Britain under the Common Law

The kingship was assumed as a right derived from rule of law and hence the rule of law alone would prevail rather than the king's will alone as had been posited by legal theorist Henry Bracton and followed by the legal scholars during mid-thirteenth century.... There was no written constitution except during 1653 and 1660 and for the rest of the period, common law developed with the basis of the notion that any person can do according to his free will whatever is not forbidden by law including common law....
15 Pages (3750 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us