StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...

The Law and the Constitution - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
There is a justification why supremacy and sovereignty takes gratification in such a privileged position in contemporary jurisprudence in United Kingdom. For the preceding two centuries supremacy has been a focus of western constitutional ground. In reality, supremacy has been portrayed the "end," the ultimate expression, of a modern constitution in United Kingdom.
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.3% of users find it useful
The Law and the Constitution
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Law and the Constitution"

Download file to see previous pages

V. Dicey who made a robust restatement of this very old doctrine at the end of twenty-century. According to A. V. Dicey the principle of supremacy and sovereignty is the basis of the British Constitution. Parliament itself is not capable to confine its own future proceedings, courts cannot inquire or decline to give effect to its ratifications, and all other law-making institutions in the United Kingdom are secondary to it.Supremacy of Parliament is so magnificent and supreme, that it cannot be restricted, either for reasons or persons, under any circumstances.

(Jennings, 1959) In other words, Parliament's supremacy can be estimated from the fact that it can do each fascination that is not naturally unattainable. The initial portion of Dicey's Law of the Constitution was dedicated to defying the unorthodox impression that there might be supposed boundaries to sovereignty and supreme. Dicey highly declared that the Parliament had authority and power to make or unmake any law whatever. For historical authority, Dicey naturally sought recourse to the Act of Settlement and to the pervasive constitutional traditions that dangle about the great and glorious revolution of 1688.

Sovereignty had to be free, and it was for this motive that Dicey appeared so sideways at the very suggestion of international law, or undeniably those legal orders that sought to somehow share authority and power.Supremacy of Parliament can be divided into three significant essentials: firstly Parliament can formulate or unmake any law; secondly Parliament cannot force its heirs and lastly Courts cannot inquire an act of Parliament. In the light of the European Communities Act 1972 Parliament can still only do this if the legislation is not an EU parameter or instruction and is only conjugal legislation.

Parliament cannot for instance rescind an Act that a EU dictate had structured the administration to make as they did in the case of Commission of the EC v United Kingdom (1979). Further the reality that Parliament cannot bind its successors is considerable. This originally predestined that a current, say Conservative government could not execute legislation that would come into power when a Labour government came into power. Now this refers to the EU in that the British government cannot outdo any legislation that would in future conflict with any recommended legislation of European Union.

Most notably according to the doctrine of Supremacy of Parliament, the courts of United Kingdom are not capable to inquire an act of Parliament. It is the reason that any proceed of Parliament is the ultimate law of the land, obligatory all through the territory, and alterable only by another act of Parliament. Parliament is defined as a congregation poised of the Commons, the Lords chronological and devout, and the Crown. Only these three institutions acting collectively include the sovereign Parliament, and were able to make law supreme throughout the realm.

The Crown, Lords, and Commons unprejudiced each other; their contending interests fashioned political strains within Parliament to efficiently contain its implementation of unbounded supremacy. The Crown in Parliament obsessed total and unrestricted legislative supremacy, having the right to make or

...Download file to see next pages Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“The Law and the Constitution Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
The Law and the Constitution Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1531670-the-law-and-the-constitution
(The Law and the Constitution Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
The Law and the Constitution Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/1531670-the-law-and-the-constitution.
“The Law and the Constitution Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1531670-the-law-and-the-constitution.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Law and the Constitution

Formal and Substantive Aspects of the Rule of Law

hellip; In the battle against the king, he succeeded in maintaining that the King must be under God and the law and thus vindicated the supremacy of law against this concept, that Dicey developed the doctrine of coke in this classic book "The Law and the Constitution" Published in 1855.... the constitution is not the source but consequence of the rights of the individuals.... The term rule of law refers to the principles of legality which refers to a government based on principle of law and not of men (J....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

The Sovereignty of Parliament

The basic tenets of these are based on the precepts of the constitution itself.... ne of the most contentious issues of debate concerning the constitution remains the Sovereignty of Parliament.... Dicey in 1885 summarized in his definition of the Rule of Law three areas are comprised: English law is what rules the citizens, not those that establish the law or choose to use it for their own advantage; there is an intrinsic understanding that all are equal under the law; and lastly that a constitution is a result of the laws of the land, not the converse....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Answer the two questions

The judicial review power is important for the judiciary since it is the one that is capable of interpreting The Law and the Constitution.... Lastly, he argues that the judiciary ought to be authorized to reject laws enacted by the Congress that are contrary to the constitution (law.... According to Hamilton, making the judges permanent through the constitution makes sure that they cannot be changed according to the executive's or the legislature's interests (law....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Process of the supreme court

It is responsible for verifying whether due process of The Law and the Constitution were adhered to as… It is comprised of nine Justices, one of whom is the Chief Justice. The Supreme Court process has strengths which have proved to be useful to the Supreme Court judgments.... It is responsible for verifying whether due process of The Law and the Constitution were adhered to as judgments were made.... The amendments to the constitution for example, in what is referred to as the second bill of rights have assured all citizens of equal rights, making the document very useful in the operations and decisions of the Supreme Court....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Theories of Human Rights

This argument downplays the fact that the president and the executive are not above The Law and the Constitution (Smith & Li-Ching 24).... The Fourth amendment of the constitution of the United States provides Americans with certain important freedoms.... The means they use to protect the country from attacks are supposed to be constrained by the constitution.... The FBI and the NSA have been sweeping through The problem with the Act stems from the way it was passed into law....
5 Pages (1250 words) Term Paper

The Police in America

Dempsey and Forst assert that the law and criminal justice system of the United States originated from the English.... Dempsey and Forst assert that the law and criminal justice system of the United States originated from the English.... Due to the current law enforcement, the police officers carry out many responsibilities that put them in stressful situations, forcing them to address some tough decisions.... This “bad fact” makes most people to have little trust with their law enforcement institutions....
4 Pages (1000 words) Book Report/Review

Doctrine of Sovereignty and Jackson

Moreover, once an Act is passed, a judicial reference to the law Commission's Report on the Interpretation of Statues10 in order to determine the true construction of a statute is contravened on the basis that it is of doubtful benefit and a costly exercise11.... As stated by Dicey: (a) “Parliament has the right to make or unmake any law whatever” and (b) no person or body may be recognized as having the legal authority to set aside or invalidate the acts of Parliament, except Parliament itself....
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study

Active and Passive Euthanasia is a Sound Doctrine

This essay "Active and Passive Euthanasia is a Sound Doctrine" shows the difference between active and passive euthanasia citing various examples, arguments from scholars, and readings.... nbsp;Active euthanasia is where a doctor is directly involved in the death of a patient.... nbsp;… As the paper outlines, if a patient is suffering from an incurable disease, causing more pain, grief, and sorrow to the patient and his or her family, then it is ethical to administer active euthanasia in order to cut off the pain and relieve the family from much grief caused by seeing their loved one in pain and sorrow....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us